Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — mL/d to m3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Days (mL/d) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per days = 1.157407e-14 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-11 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Days to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Milliliter per Days and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = milliliter per days × 1.157407e-14
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per days-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 1.157407e-14.
Simple example
1 mL/d × 1.157407e-14 = 1.157407e-14 m3/ms
1 milliliter per days = 1.157407e-14 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/d × 1.157407e-14 = 6.944444e-13 m3/ms
60 milliliter per days = 6.944444e-13 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Days (mL/d) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/d | 1.157407e-15 m3/ms |
| 1 mL/d | 1.157407e-14 m3/ms |
| 10 mL/d | 1.157407e-13 m3/ms |
| 60 mL/d | 6.944444e-13 m3/ms |
| 100 mL/d | 1.157407e-12 m3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/d | 1.157407e-11 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Milliliter per Days
1.157407e-14 m3/ms × 8.64e+13 = 0.999999648 mL/d
1.157407e-14 cubic meters per millisecond = 0.999999648 milliliter per days.
milliliter per days = cubic meters per millisecond × 8.64e+13
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Milliliter per Days.
Understanding the Milliliter per Days (mL/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per days?
1 milliliter per days equals 1.157407e-14 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per days to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per days value by 1.157407e-14. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to milliliter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 8.64e+13 milliliter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per days?
Milliliter per Days (mL/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per days to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per days and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.157407e-14 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.