Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Hours Converter — mL/decade to cL/h
Convert Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) to Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per decades = 0.0000011408 centiliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-15 / 2.77777778e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Hours
Milliliter per Decades and Centiliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per hours = milliliter per decades × 0.00000114079458625
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per decades equals 3.168874e-15 base units, and 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per decades-to-centiliter per hours factor of 0.00000114079458625.
Simple example
1 mL/decade × 0.000001140794586 = 0.0000011408 cL/h
1 milliliter per decades = 0.0000011408 centiliter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mL/decade × 0.000001140794586 = 0.0000684477 cL/h
60 milliliter per decades = 0.0000684477 centiliter per hours.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) | Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/decade | 1.140795e-7 cL/h |
| 1 mL/decade | 0.0000011408 cL/h |
| 10 mL/decade | 0.0000114079 cL/h |
| 60 mL/decade | 0.0000684477 cL/h |
| 100 mL/decade | 0.0001140795 cL/h |
| 1,000 mL/decade | 0.0011407946 cL/h |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Hours to Milliliter per Decades
0.0000011408 cL/h × 876582 = 1.000004746 mL/decade
0.0000011408 centiliter per hours = 1.000004746 milliliter per decades.
milliliter per decades = centiliter per hours × 876582
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Hours to Milliliter per Decades.
Understanding the Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per hours are in 1 milliliter per decades?
1 milliliter per decades equals 0.0000011408 centiliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per decades to centiliter per hours?
Multiply the milliliter per decades value by 0.000001140794586. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per hours back to milliliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per hours equals 876,582 milliliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per decades?
Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per decades to centiliter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per decades and centiliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001140794586 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.