Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — mL/decade to cL/min
Convert Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per decades = 1.901324e-8 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-15 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes
Milliliter per Decades and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = milliliter per decades × 1.901324e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per decades equals 3.168874e-15 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per decades-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 1.901324e-8.
Simple example
1 mL/decade × 1.901324e-8 = 1.901324e-8 cL/min
1 milliliter per decades = 1.901324e-8 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/decade × 1.901324e-8 = 0.0000011408 cL/min
60 milliliter per decades = 0.0000011408 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/decade | 1.901324e-9 cL/min |
| 1 mL/decade | 1.901324e-8 cL/min |
| 10 mL/decade | 1.901324e-7 cL/min |
| 60 mL/decade | 0.0000011408 cL/min |
| 100 mL/decade | 0.0000019013 cL/min |
| 1,000 mL/decade | 0.0000190132 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Decades
1.901324e-8 cL/min × 52594920 = 0.9999998367 mL/decade
1.901324e-8 centiliter per minutes = 0.9999998367 milliliter per decades.
milliliter per decades = centiliter per minutes × 52594920
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Decades.
Understanding the Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per decades?
1 milliliter per decades equals 1.901324e-8 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per decades to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per decades value by 1.901324e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to milliliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 52,594,920 milliliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per decades?
Milliliter per Decades (mL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per decades to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per decades and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.901324e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.