Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — mL/fn to cL/min
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0000049603 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Minutes
Milliliter per Fortnight and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = milliliters per fortnight × 0.00000496031746032
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 0.00000496031746032.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 0.00000496031746 = 0.0000049603 cL/min
1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0000049603 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 0.00000496031746 = 0.000297619 cL/min
60 milliliters per fortnight = 0.000297619 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 4.960317e-7 cL/min |
| 1 mL/fn | 0.0000049603 cL/min |
| 10 mL/fn | 0.0000496032 cL/min |
| 60 mL/fn | 0.000297619 cL/min |
| 100 mL/fn | 0.0004960317 cL/min |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 0.0049603175 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Fortnight
0.0000049603 cL/min × 201600 = 0.99999648 mL/fn
0.0000049603 centiliter per minutes = 0.99999648 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = centiliter per minutes × 201600
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 0.0000049603 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 0.00000496031746. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 201,600 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00000496031746 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.