Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — mL/fn to cL/s
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-8 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds
Milliliter per Fortnight and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = milliliters per fortnight × 8.267196e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 8.267196e-8.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 8.267196e-8 = 8.267196e-8 cL/s
1 milliliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-8 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 8.267196e-8 = 0.0000049603 cL/s
60 milliliters per fortnight = 0.0000049603 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 8.267196e-9 cL/s |
| 1 mL/fn | 8.267196e-8 cL/s |
| 10 mL/fn | 8.267196e-7 cL/s |
| 60 mL/fn | 0.0000049603 cL/s |
| 100 mL/fn | 0.0000082672 cL/s |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 0.000082672 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Milliliter per Fortnight
8.267196e-8 cL/s × 12096000 = 1.000000028 mL/fn
8.267196e-8 centiliter per seconds = 1.000000028 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = centiliter per seconds × 12096000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-8 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 8.267196e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 12,096,000 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.267196e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.