Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — mL/fn to cm3/h
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0029761905 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Milliliter per Fortnight and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = milliliters per fortnight × 0.00297619047619
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 0.00297619047619.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 0.002976190476 = 0.0029761905 cm3/h
1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0029761905 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 0.002976190476 = 0.1785714286 cm3/h
60 milliliters per fortnight = 0.1785714286 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 0.000297619 cm3/h |
| 1 mL/fn | 0.0029761905 cm3/h |
| 10 mL/fn | 0.0297619048 cm3/h |
| 60 mL/fn | 0.1785714286 cm3/h |
| 100 mL/fn | 0.2976190476 cm3/h |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 2.976190476 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Fortnight
0.0029761905 cm3/h × 336 = 1.000000008 mL/fn
0.0029761905 cubic centimeter per hours = 1.000000008 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = cubic centimeter per hours × 336
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 0.0029761905 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 0.002976190476. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 336 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.002976190476 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.