Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Days Converter — mL/fn to mm3/d
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 71.42857143 cubic millimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 1.15740741e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Days
Milliliter per Fortnight and Cubic Millimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per days = milliliters per fortnight × 71.4285714286
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-cubic millimeter per days factor of 71.4285714286.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 71.42857143 = 71.42857143 mm3/d
1 milliliter per fortnight = 71.42857143 cubic millimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 71.42857143 = 4,285.714286 mm3/d
60 milliliters per fortnight = 4,285.714286 cubic millimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 7.142857143 mm3/d |
| 1 mL/fn | 71.42857143 mm3/d |
| 10 mL/fn | 714.2857143 mm3/d |
| 60 mL/fn | 4,285.714286 mm3/d |
| 100 mL/fn | 7,142.857143 mm3/d |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 71,428.57143 mm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliter per Fortnight
71.42857143 mm3/d × 0.014 = 1 mL/fn
71.42857143 cubic millimeter per days = 1 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = cubic millimeter per days × 0.014
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per days are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 71.42857143 cubic millimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to cubic millimeter per days?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 71.42857143. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 0.014 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to cubic millimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and cubic millimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 71.42857143 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.