Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Decaliter per Minutes Converter — mL/fn to daL/min
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 4.960317e-9 decaliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Decaliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 0.0001666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Decaliter per Minutes
Milliliter per Fortnight and Decaliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliter per minutes = milliliters per fortnight × 4.960317e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 decaliter per minutes equals 0.000166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-decaliter per minutes factor of 4.960317e-9.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 4.960317e-9 = 4.960317e-9 daL/min
1 milliliter per fortnight = 4.960317e-9 decaliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 4.960317e-9 = 2.97619e-7 daL/min
60 milliliters per fortnight = 2.97619e-7 decaliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 4.960317e-10 daL/min |
| 1 mL/fn | 4.960317e-9 daL/min |
| 10 mL/fn | 4.960317e-8 daL/min |
| 60 mL/fn | 2.97619e-7 daL/min |
| 100 mL/fn | 4.960317e-7 daL/min |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 0.0000049603 daL/min |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Fortnight
4.960317e-9 daL/min × 201600000 = 0.9999999072 mL/fn
4.960317e-9 decaliter per minutes = 0.9999999072 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = decaliter per minutes × 201600000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 4.960317e-9 decaliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to decaliter per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 4.960317e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per minutes back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per minutes equals 201,600,000 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per minutes?
Decaliter per Minutes (daL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to decaliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and decaliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 4.960317e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.