Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Fluid ounce per Weeks Converter — mL/fn to fl oz/wk
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0169070114 fluid ounce per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Fluid ounce per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 4.88980317e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Fluid ounce per Weeks
Milliliter per Fortnight and Fluid ounce per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per weeks = milliliters per fortnight × 0.0169070113509
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-fluid ounce per weeks factor of 0.0169070113509.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 0.01690701135 = 0.0169070114 fl oz/wk
1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.0169070114 fluid ounce per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 0.01690701135 = 1.014420681 fl oz/wk
60 milliliters per fortnight = 1.014420681 fluid ounce per weeks.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 0.0016907011 fl oz/wk |
| 1 mL/fn | 0.0169070114 fl oz/wk |
| 10 mL/fn | 0.1690701135 fl oz/wk |
| 60 mL/fn | 1.014420681 fl oz/wk |
| 100 mL/fn | 1.690701135 fl oz/wk |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 16.90701135 fl oz/wk |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Fortnight
0.0169070114 fl oz/wk × 59.14705913 = 1.000000003 mL/fn
0.0169070114 fluid ounce per weeks = 1.000000003 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = fluid ounce per weeks × 59.147059125
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per weeks are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 0.0169070114 fluid ounce per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to fluid ounce per weeks?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 0.01690701135. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 59.14705913 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to fluid ounce per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and fluid ounce per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01690701135 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.