Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Weeks Converter — mL/fn to metric tsp/wk
Convert Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) to Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.1 metric teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
Milliliter per Fortnight and Metric teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per weeks = milliliters per fortnight × 0.1
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per fortnight-to-metric teaspoon per weeks factor of 0.1.
Simple example
1 mL/fn × 0.1 = 0.1 metric tsp/wk
1 milliliter per fortnight = 0.1 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mL/fn × 0.1 = 6 metric tsp/wk
60 milliliters per fortnight = 6 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) | Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/fn | 0.01 metric tsp/wk |
| 1 mL/fn | 0.1 metric tsp/wk |
| 10 mL/fn | 1 metric tsp/wk |
| 60 mL/fn | 6 metric tsp/wk |
| 100 mL/fn | 10 metric tsp/wk |
| 1,000 mL/fn | 100 metric tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Milliliter per Fortnight
0.1 metric tsp/wk × 10 = 1 mL/fn
0.1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 1 milliliters per fortnight.
milliliters per fortnight = metric teaspoon per weeks × 10
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Milliliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per weeks are in 1 milliliter per fortnight?
1 milliliter per fortnight equals 0.1 metric teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the milliliter per fortnight value by 0.1. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks back to milliliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 10 milliliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per fortnight to metric teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per fortnight and metric teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.