Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Hours to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — mL/h to yd3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per hours = 3.633196e-13 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Hours to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Hours to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Milliliter per Hours and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = milliliter per hours × 3.633196e-13
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per hours-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 3.633196e-13.
Simple example
1 mL/h × 3.633196e-13 = 3.633196e-13 yd3/ms
1 milliliter per hours = 3.633196e-13 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/h × 3.633196e-13 = 2.179918e-11 yd3/ms
60 milliliter per hours = 2.179918e-11 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/h | 3.633196e-14 yd3/ms |
| 1 mL/h | 3.633196e-13 yd3/ms |
| 10 mL/h | 3.633196e-12 yd3/ms |
| 60 mL/h | 2.179918e-11 yd3/ms |
| 100 mL/h | 3.633196e-11 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/h | 3.633196e-10 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Milliliter per Hours
3.633196e-13 yd3/ms × 2.752397e+12 = 0.9999999547 mL/h
3.633196e-13 cubic yards per millisecond = 0.9999999547 milliliter per hours.
milliliter per hours = cubic yards per millisecond × 2.752397e+12
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Milliliter per Hours.
Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per hours?
1 milliliter per hours equals 3.633196e-13 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per hours to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per hours value by 3.633196e-13. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to milliliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 2.752397e+12 milliliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per hours?
Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per hours to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per hours and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.633196e-13 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.