Milliliter per Hours to Hectoliter per Minutes Converter — mL/h to hL/min

Convert Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) to Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per hours = 1.666667e-7 hectoliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Milliliter per Hours to Hectoliter per Minutes converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 milliliter per hours = 1.666667e-7 hectoliter per minutes
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 0.001666666667.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Milliliter per Hours to Hectoliter per Minutes

Milliliter per Hours and Hectoliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

hectoliter per minutes = milliliter per hours × 1.666667e-7

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 0.00166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per hours-to-hectoliter per minutes factor of 1.666667e-7.

Simple example

1 mL/h × 1.666667e-7 = 1.666667e-7 hL/min

1 milliliter per hours = 1.666667e-7 hectoliter per minutes.

Real-world example

60 mL/h × 1.666667e-7 = 0.00001 hL/min

60 milliliter per hours = 0.00001 hectoliter per minutes.

Conversion table

Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)
0.1 mL/h1.666667e-8 hL/min
1 mL/h1.666667e-7 hL/min
10 mL/h0.0000016667 hL/min
60 mL/h0.00001 hL/min
100 mL/h0.0000166667 hL/min
1,000 mL/h0.0001666667 hL/min

Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Hours

1.666667e-7 hL/min × 6000000 = 1.0000002 mL/h

1.666667e-7 hectoliter per minutes = 1.0000002 milliliter per hours.

milliliter per hours = hectoliter per minutes × 6000000

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Minutes to Milliliter per Hours.

Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many hectoliter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per hours?

1 milliliter per hours equals 1.666667e-7 hectoliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert milliliter per hours to hectoliter per minutes?

Multiply the milliliter per hours value by 1.666667e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert hectoliter per minutes back to milliliter per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per minutes equals 6,000,000 milliliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a milliliter per hours?

Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a hectoliter per minutes?

Hectoliter per Minutes (hL/min) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the milliliter per hours to hectoliter per minutes conversion exact?

Yes. Both milliliter per hours and hectoliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.666667e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.