Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — mL/h to imp qt/wk
Convert Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per hours = 0.1478193349 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Hours to Imperial quart per Weeks
Milliliter per Hours and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = milliliter per hours × 0.147819334857
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per hours-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 0.147819334857.
Simple example
1 mL/h × 0.1478193349 = 0.1478193349 imp qt/wk
1 milliliter per hours = 0.1478193349 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mL/h × 0.1478193349 = 8.869160091 imp qt/wk
60 milliliter per hours = 8.869160091 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/h | 0.0147819335 imp qt/wk |
| 1 mL/h | 0.1478193349 imp qt/wk |
| 10 mL/h | 1.478193349 imp qt/wk |
| 60 mL/h | 8.869160091 imp qt/wk |
| 100 mL/h | 14.78193349 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 mL/h | 147.8193349 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours
0.1478193349 imp qt/wk × 6.765014881 = 1 mL/h
0.1478193349 imperial quart per weeks = 1 milliliter per hours.
milliliter per hours = imperial quart per weeks × 6.76501488095
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours.
Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 milliliter per hours?
1 milliliter per hours equals 0.1478193349 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per hours to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the milliliter per hours value by 0.1478193349. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to milliliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 6.765014881 milliliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per hours?
Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per hours to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per hours and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1478193349 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.