Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Bushels per Fortnight Converter — mL/ms to bu/fn
Convert Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) to Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per millisecond = 34,325.53681 bushel per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Bushels per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 2.91328292e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Millisecond to Bushels per Fortnight
Milliliter per Millisecond and Bushel per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per fortnight = milliliters per millisecond × 34325.5368054
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per millisecond-to-bushel per fortnight factor of 34325.5368054.
Simple example
1 mL/ms × 34325.53681 = 34,325.53681 bu/fn
1 milliliter per millisecond = 34,325.53681 bushels per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/ms × 34325.53681 = 2,059,532.208 bu/fn
60 milliliters per millisecond = 2,059,532.208 bushels per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) | Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/ms | 3,432.553681 bu/fn |
| 1 mL/ms | 34,325.53681 bu/fn |
| 10 mL/ms | 343,255.3681 bu/fn |
| 60 mL/ms | 2,059,532.208 bu/fn |
| 100 mL/ms | 3,432,553.681 bu/fn |
| 1,000 mL/ms | 34,325,536.81 bu/fn |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Fortnight to Milliliter per Millisecond
1 bu/fn × 0.00002913282917 = 0.0000291328 mL/ms
1 bushel per fortnight = 0.0000291328 milliliters per millisecond.
milliliters per millisecond = bushels per fortnight × 0.0000291328291724
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Fortnight to Milliliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per millisecond?
1 milliliter per millisecond equals 34,325.53681 bushels per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond to bushel per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per millisecond value by 34325.53681. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per fortnight back to milliliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per fortnight equals 0.0000291328 milliliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per fortnight?
Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per millisecond to bushel per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per millisecond and bushel per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 34325.53681 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.