Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond Converter — mL/ms to m3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) to Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per millisecond = 0.000001 cubic meter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 1000.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Millisecond to Cubic Meters per Millisecond
Milliliter per Millisecond and Cubic Meter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meters per millisecond = milliliters per millisecond × 0.000001
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per millisecond-to-cubic meter per millisecond factor of 0.000001.
Simple example
1 mL/ms × 0.000001 = 0.000001 m3/ms
1 milliliter per millisecond = 0.000001 cubic meters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/ms × 0.000001 = 0.00006 m3/ms
60 milliliters per millisecond = 0.00006 cubic meters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) | Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/ms | 1e-7 m3/ms |
| 1 mL/ms | 0.000001 m3/ms |
| 10 mL/ms | 0.00001 m3/ms |
| 60 mL/ms | 0.00006 m3/ms |
| 100 mL/ms | 0.0001 m3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/ms | 0.001 m3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Milliliter per Millisecond
0.000001 m3/ms × 1000000 = 1 mL/ms
0.000001 cubic meters per millisecond = 1 milliliter per millisecond.
milliliters per millisecond = cubic meters per millisecond × 1000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Millisecond to Milliliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meters per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per millisecond?
1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.000001 cubic meters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond to cubic meter per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per millisecond value by 0.000001. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per millisecond back to milliliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per millisecond equals 1,000,000 milliliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per millisecond?
Cubic Meter per Millisecond (m3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per millisecond to cubic meter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per millisecond and cubic meter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.