Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Quarts per Fortnight Converter — mL/ms to qt/fn
Convert Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) to Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per millisecond = 1,278,170.058 quart per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliters per Millisecond to Quarts per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.001 / 7.82368507e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliters per Millisecond to Quarts per Fortnight
Milliliter per Millisecond and Quart per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
quarts per fortnight = milliliters per millisecond × 1278170.05813
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, and 1 quart per fortnight equals 7.823685e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per millisecond-to-quart per fortnight factor of 1278170.05813.
Simple example
1 mL/ms × 1278170.058 = 1,278,170.058 qt/fn
1 milliliter per millisecond = 1,278,170.058 quarts per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/ms × 1278170.058 = 76,690,203.49 qt/fn
60 milliliters per millisecond = 76,690,203.49 quarts per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) | Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/ms | 127,817.0058 qt/fn |
| 1 mL/ms | 1,278,170.058 qt/fn |
| 10 mL/ms | 12,781,700.58 qt/fn |
| 60 mL/ms | 76,690,203.49 qt/fn |
| 100 mL/ms | 127,817,005.8 qt/fn |
| 1,000 mL/ms | 1,278,170,058 qt/fn |
Reverse conversion: Quart per Fortnight to Milliliter per Millisecond
1 qt/fn × 7.823685e-7 = 7.823685e-7 mL/ms
1 quart per fortnight = 7.823685e-7 milliliters per millisecond.
milliliters per millisecond = quarts per fortnight × 7.823685e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Fortnight to Milliliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many quarts per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per millisecond?
1 milliliter per millisecond equals 1,278,170.058 quarts per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond to quart per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per millisecond value by 1278170.058. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert quart per fortnight back to milliliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per fortnight equals 7.823685e-7 milliliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a quart per fortnight?
Quart per Fortnight (qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per millisecond to quart per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per millisecond and quart per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1278170.058 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.