Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Minutes to Bushel per Decades Converter — mL/min to bu/decade
Convert Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) to Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per minutes = 149.2517247 bushel per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Minutes to Bushel per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 1.11668168e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Minutes to Bushel per Decades
Milliliter per Minutes and Bushel per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per decades = milliliter per minutes × 149.251724722
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per minutes-to-bushel per decades factor of 149.251724722.
Simple example
1 mL/min × 149.2517247 = 149.2517247 bu/decade
1 milliliter per minutes = 149.2517247 bushel per decades.
Real-world example
60 mL/min × 149.2517247 = 8,955.103483 bu/decade
60 milliliter per minutes = 8,955.103483 bushel per decades.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) | Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/min | 14.92517247 bu/decade |
| 1 mL/min | 149.2517247 bu/decade |
| 10 mL/min | 1,492.517247 bu/decade |
| 60 mL/min | 8,955.103483 bu/decade |
| 100 mL/min | 14,925.17247 bu/decade |
| 1,000 mL/min | 149,251.7247 bu/decade |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Decades to Milliliter per Minutes
149.2517247 bu/decade × 0.006700090078 = 0.9999999999 mL/min
149.2517247 bushel per decades = 0.9999999999 milliliter per minutes.
milliliter per minutes = bushel per decades × 0.00670009007845
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Decades to Milliliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per decades are in 1 milliliter per minutes?
1 milliliter per minutes equals 149.2517247 bushel per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes to bushel per decades?
Multiply the milliliter per minutes value by 149.2517247. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per decades back to milliliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per decades equals 0.0067000901 milliliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per minutes to bushel per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per minutes and bushel per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 149.2517247 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.