Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight Converter — mL/min to cm3/fn
Convert Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per minutes = 20,160 cubic centimeter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 8.26719577e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight
Milliliter per Minutes and Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per fortnight = milliliter per minutes × 20160
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per minutes-to-cubic centimeter per fortnight factor of 20160.
Simple example
1 mL/min × 20160 = 20,160 cm3/fn
1 milliliter per minutes = 20,160 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/min × 20160 = 1,209,600 cm3/fn
60 milliliter per minutes = 1,209,600 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) | Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/min | 2,016 cm3/fn |
| 1 mL/min | 20,160 cm3/fn |
| 10 mL/min | 201,600 cm3/fn |
| 60 mL/min | 1,209,600 cm3/fn |
| 100 mL/min | 2,016,000 cm3/fn |
| 1,000 mL/min | 20,160,000 cm3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Milliliter per Minutes
1 cm3/fn × 0.0000496031746 = 0.0000496032 mL/min
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 0.0000496032 milliliter per minutes.
milliliter per minutes = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 0.0000496031746032
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight to Milliliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per minutes?
1 milliliter per minutes equals 20,160 cubic centimeters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per minutes value by 20160. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight back to milliliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 0.0000496032 milliliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per minutes to cubic centimeter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per minutes and cubic centimeter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 20160 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.