Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond Converter — mL/min to in3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) to Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per minutes = 0.0000010171 cubic inch per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 0.016387064.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inches per Millisecond
Milliliter per Minutes and Cubic inch per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inches per millisecond = milliliter per minutes × 0.00000101706240158
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per minutes-to-cubic inch per millisecond factor of 0.00000101706240158.
Simple example
1 mL/min × 0.000001017062402 = 0.0000010171 in3/ms
1 milliliter per minutes = 0.0000010171 cubic inches per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/min × 0.000001017062402 = 0.0000610237 in3/ms
60 milliliter per minutes = 0.0000610237 cubic inches per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) | Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/min | 1.017062e-7 in3/ms |
| 1 mL/min | 0.0000010171 in3/ms |
| 10 mL/min | 0.0000101706 in3/ms |
| 60 mL/min | 0.0000610237 in3/ms |
| 100 mL/min | 0.0001017062 in3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/min | 0.0010170624 in3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Minutes
0.0000010171 in3/ms × 983223.84 = 1.000036968 mL/min
0.0000010171 cubic inches per millisecond = 1.000036968 milliliter per minutes.
milliliter per minutes = cubic inches per millisecond × 983223.84
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inches per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per minutes?
1 milliliter per minutes equals 0.0000010171 cubic inches per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes to cubic inch per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per minutes value by 0.000001017062402. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond back to milliliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 983,223.84 milliliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per minutes to cubic inch per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per minutes and cubic inch per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001017062402 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.