Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Minutes Converter — mL/min to in3/min
Convert Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) to Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per minutes = 0.0610237441 cubic inch per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 2.73117733e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Minutes to Cubic inch per Minutes
Milliliter per Minutes and Cubic inch per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per minutes = milliliter per minutes × 0.0610237440947
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 2.731177e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per minutes-to-cubic inch per minutes factor of 0.0610237440947.
Simple example
1 mL/min × 0.06102374409 = 0.0610237441 in3/min
1 milliliter per minutes = 0.0610237441 cubic inch per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/min × 0.06102374409 = 3.661424646 in3/min
60 milliliter per minutes = 3.661424646 cubic inch per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) | Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/min | 0.0061023744 in3/min |
| 1 mL/min | 0.0610237441 in3/min |
| 10 mL/min | 0.6102374409 in3/min |
| 60 mL/min | 3.661424646 in3/min |
| 100 mL/min | 6.102374409 in3/min |
| 1,000 mL/min | 61.02374409 in3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Minutes to Milliliter per Minutes
0.0610237441 in3/min × 16.387064 = 1 mL/min
0.0610237441 cubic inch per minutes = 1 milliliter per minutes.
milliliter per minutes = cubic inch per minutes × 16.387064
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Minutes to Milliliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per minutes are in 1 milliliter per minutes?
1 milliliter per minutes equals 0.0610237441 cubic inch per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes to cubic inch per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per minutes value by 0.06102374409. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per minutes back to milliliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 16.387064 milliliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per minutes?
Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per minutes to cubic inch per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per minutes and cubic inch per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.06102374409 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.