Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Minutes to Gallon per Decades Converter — mL/min to gal/decade
Convert Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) to Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per minutes = 1,389.410796 gallon per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Minutes to Gallon per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-8 / 1.19954924e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Minutes to Gallon per Decades
Milliliter per Minutes and Gallon per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallon per decades = milliliter per minutes × 1389.410796
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, and 1 gallon per decades equals 1.199549e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per minutes-to-gallon per decades factor of 1389.410796.
Simple example
1 mL/min × 1389.410796 = 1,389.410796 gal/decade
1 milliliter per minutes = 1,389.410796 gallon per decades.
Real-world example
60 mL/min × 1389.410796 = 83,364.64776 gal/decade
60 milliliter per minutes = 83,364.64776 gallon per decades.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) | Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/min | 138.9410796 gal/decade |
| 1 mL/min | 1,389.410796 gal/decade |
| 10 mL/min | 13,894.10796 gal/decade |
| 60 mL/min | 83,364.64776 gal/decade |
| 100 mL/min | 138,941.0796 gal/decade |
| 1,000 mL/min | 1,389,410.796 gal/decade |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Decades to Milliliter per Minutes
1 gal/decade × 0.000719729545 = 0.0007197295 mL/min
1 gallon per decades = 0.0007197295 milliliter per minutes.
milliliter per minutes = gallon per decades × 0.000719729544983
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Decades to Milliliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Decades (gal/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallon per decades are in 1 milliliter per minutes?
1 milliliter per minutes equals 1,389.410796 gallon per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes to gallon per decades?
Multiply the milliliter per minutes value by 1389.410796. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per decades back to milliliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per decades equals 0.0007197295 milliliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per decades?
Gallon per Decades (gal/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per minutes to gallon per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per minutes and gallon per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1389.410796 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.