Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — mL/s to ft3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per seconds = 3.531467e-8 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Milliliter per Seconds and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = milliliter per seconds × 3.531467e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per seconds-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 3.531467e-8.
Simple example
1 mL/s × 3.531467e-8 = 3.531467e-8 ft3/ms
1 milliliter per seconds = 3.531467e-8 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/s × 3.531467e-8 = 0.0000021189 ft3/ms
60 milliliter per seconds = 0.0000021189 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/s | 3.531467e-9 ft3/ms |
| 1 mL/s | 3.531467e-8 ft3/ms |
| 10 mL/s | 3.531467e-7 ft3/ms |
| 60 mL/s | 0.0000021189 ft3/ms |
| 100 mL/s | 0.0000035315 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/s | 0.0000353147 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Milliliter per Seconds
3.531467e-8 ft3/ms × 28316846.59 = 1.000000093 mL/s
3.531467e-8 cubic feet per millisecond = 1.000000093 milliliter per seconds.
milliliter per seconds = cubic feet per millisecond × 28316846.592
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Milliliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per seconds?
1 milliliter per seconds equals 3.531467e-8 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per seconds value by 3.531467e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to milliliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28,316,846.59 milliliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per seconds to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per seconds and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.531467e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.