Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic inches per Millisecond Converter — mL/s to in3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) to Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per seconds = 0.0000610237 cubic inch per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic inches per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 0.016387064.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic inches per Millisecond
Milliliter per Seconds and Cubic inch per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inches per millisecond = milliliter per seconds × 0.0000610237440947
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per seconds-to-cubic inch per millisecond factor of 0.0000610237440947.
Simple example
1 mL/s × 0.00006102374409 = 0.0000610237 in3/ms
1 milliliter per seconds = 0.0000610237 cubic inches per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/s × 0.00006102374409 = 0.0036614246 in3/ms
60 milliliter per seconds = 0.0036614246 cubic inches per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) | Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/s | 0.0000061024 in3/ms |
| 1 mL/s | 0.0000610237 in3/ms |
| 10 mL/s | 0.0006102374 in3/ms |
| 60 mL/s | 0.0036614246 in3/ms |
| 100 mL/s | 0.0061023744 in3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/s | 0.0610237441 in3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Seconds
0.0000610237 in3/ms × 16387.064 = 0.9999992774 mL/s
0.0000610237 cubic inches per millisecond = 0.9999992774 milliliter per seconds.
milliliter per seconds = cubic inches per millisecond × 16387.064
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inches per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per seconds?
1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.0000610237 cubic inches per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds to cubic inch per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per seconds value by 0.00006102374409. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond back to milliliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 16,387.064 milliliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per seconds to cubic inch per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per seconds and cubic inch per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00006102374409 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.