Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Minutes Converter — mL/s to yd3/min
Convert Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) to Cubic yard per Minutes (yd3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per seconds = 0.000078477 cubic yard per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 0.01274258097.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Seconds to Cubic yard per Minutes
Milliliter per Seconds and Cubic yard per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per minutes = milliliter per seconds × 0.0000784770371589
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 cubic yard per minutes equals 0.0127425809664 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per seconds-to-cubic yard per minutes factor of 0.0000784770371589.
Simple example
1 mL/s × 0.00007847703716 = 0.000078477 yd3/min
1 milliliter per seconds = 0.000078477 cubic yard per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/s × 0.00007847703716 = 0.0047086222 yd3/min
60 milliliter per seconds = 0.0047086222 cubic yard per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) | Cubic yard per Minutes (yd3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/s | 0.0000078477 yd3/min |
| 1 mL/s | 0.000078477 yd3/min |
| 10 mL/s | 0.0007847704 yd3/min |
| 60 mL/s | 0.0047086222 yd3/min |
| 100 mL/s | 0.0078477037 yd3/min |
| 1,000 mL/s | 0.0784770372 yd3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Minutes to Milliliter per Seconds
0.000078477 yd3/min × 12742.58097 = 0.9999995265 mL/s
0.000078477 cubic yard per minutes = 0.9999995265 milliliter per seconds.
milliliter per seconds = cubic yard per minutes × 12742.5809664
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Minutes to Milliliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Minutes (yd3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per minutes are in 1 milliliter per seconds?
1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000078477 cubic yard per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds to cubic yard per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per seconds value by 0.00007847703716. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per minutes back to milliliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per minutes equals 12,742.58097 milliliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per minutes?
Cubic yard per Minutes (yd3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per seconds to cubic yard per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per seconds and cubic yard per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00007847703716 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.