Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Weeks Converter — mL/s to fl oz/wk
Convert Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) to Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per seconds = 20,450.72093 fluid ounce per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 4.88980317e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Seconds to Fluid ounce per Weeks
Milliliter per Seconds and Fluid ounce per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per weeks = milliliter per seconds × 20450.7209301
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per seconds-to-fluid ounce per weeks factor of 20450.7209301.
Simple example
1 mL/s × 20450.72093 = 20,450.72093 fl oz/wk
1 milliliter per seconds = 20,450.72093 fluid ounce per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mL/s × 20450.72093 = 1,227,043.256 fl oz/wk
60 milliliter per seconds = 1,227,043.256 fluid ounce per weeks.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) | Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/s | 2,045.072093 fl oz/wk |
| 1 mL/s | 20,450.72093 fl oz/wk |
| 10 mL/s | 204,507.2093 fl oz/wk |
| 60 mL/s | 1,227,043.256 fl oz/wk |
| 100 mL/s | 2,045,072.093 fl oz/wk |
| 1,000 mL/s | 20,450,720.93 fl oz/wk |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds
1 fl oz/wk × 0.00004889803168 = 0.000048898 mL/s
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.000048898 milliliter per seconds.
milliliter per seconds = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.000048898031684
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per weeks are in 1 milliliter per seconds?
1 milliliter per seconds equals 20,450.72093 fluid ounce per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds to fluid ounce per weeks?
Multiply the milliliter per seconds value by 20450.72093. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks back to milliliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.000048898 milliliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per seconds to fluid ounce per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per seconds and fluid ounce per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 20450.72093 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.