Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — mL/s to imp qt/wk
Convert Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per seconds = 532.1496055 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-6 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
Milliliter per Seconds and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = milliliter per seconds × 532.149605485
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per seconds-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 532.149605485.
Simple example
1 mL/s × 532.1496055 = 532.1496055 imp qt/wk
1 milliliter per seconds = 532.1496055 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 mL/s × 532.1496055 = 31,928.97633 imp qt/wk
60 milliliter per seconds = 31,928.97633 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/s | 53.21496055 imp qt/wk |
| 1 mL/s | 532.1496055 imp qt/wk |
| 10 mL/s | 5,321.496055 imp qt/wk |
| 60 mL/s | 31,928.97633 imp qt/wk |
| 100 mL/s | 53,214.96055 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 mL/s | 532,149.6055 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds
532.1496055 imp qt/wk × 0.0018791708 = 1 mL/s
532.1496055 imperial quart per weeks = 1 milliliter per seconds.
milliliter per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 0.00187917080026
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Milliliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 milliliter per seconds?
1 milliliter per seconds equals 532.1496055 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the milliliter per seconds value by 532.1496055. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to milliliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0018791708 milliliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per seconds to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per seconds and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 532.1496055 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.