Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliter per Days Converter — mL/wk to cL/d

Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Centiliter per Days (cL/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0142857143 centiliter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliter per Days converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0142857143 centiliter per days
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.15740741e-10.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliter per Days

Milliliter per Weeks and Centiliter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

centiliter per days = milliliter per weeks × 0.0142857142857

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 centiliter per days equals 1.157407e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-centiliter per days factor of 0.0142857142857.

Simple example

1 mL/wk × 0.01428571429 = 0.0142857143 cL/d

1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0142857143 centiliter per days.

Real-world example

60 mL/wk × 0.01428571429 = 0.8571428571 cL/d

60 milliliter per weeks = 0.8571428571 centiliter per days.

Conversion table

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)Centiliter per Days (cL/d)
0.1 mL/wk0.0014285714 cL/d
1 mL/wk0.0142857143 cL/d
10 mL/wk0.1428571429 cL/d
60 mL/wk0.8571428571 cL/d
100 mL/wk1.428571429 cL/d
1,000 mL/wk14.28571429 cL/d

Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks

0.0142857143 cL/d × 70 = 1.000000001 mL/wk

0.0142857143 centiliter per days = 1.000000001 milliliter per weeks.

milliliter per weeks = centiliter per days × 70

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks.

Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Centiliter per Days (cL/d)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many centiliter per days are in 1 milliliter per weeks?

1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0142857143 centiliter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert milliliter per weeks to centiliter per days?

Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.01428571429. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert centiliter per days back to milliliter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per days equals 70 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a milliliter per weeks?

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a centiliter per days?

Centiliter per Days (cL/d) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the milliliter per weeks to centiliter per days conversion exact?

Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and centiliter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01428571429 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.