Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Fortnight Converter — mL/wk to cL/fn

Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.2 centiliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Fortnight converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 milliliter per weeks = 0.2 centiliter per fortnight
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 8.26719577e-12.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Centiliters per Fortnight

Milliliter per Weeks and Centiliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

centiliters per fortnight = milliliter per weeks × 0.2

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-centiliter per fortnight factor of 0.2.

Simple example

1 mL/wk × 0.2 = 0.2 cL/fn

1 milliliter per weeks = 0.2 centiliters per fortnight.

Real-world example

60 mL/wk × 0.2 = 12 cL/fn

60 milliliter per weeks = 12 centiliters per fortnight.

Conversion table

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
0.1 mL/wk0.02 cL/fn
1 mL/wk0.2 cL/fn
10 mL/wk2 cL/fn
60 mL/wk12 cL/fn
100 mL/wk20 cL/fn
1,000 mL/wk200 cL/fn

Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks

0.2 cL/fn × 5 = 1 mL/wk

0.2 centiliters per fortnight = 1 milliliter per weeks.

milliliter per weeks = centiliters per fortnight × 5

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks.

Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many centiliters per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per weeks?

1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.2 centiliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert milliliter per weeks to centiliter per fortnight?

Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.2. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert centiliter per fortnight back to milliliter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 5 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a milliliter per weeks?

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a centiliter per fortnight?

Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the milliliter per weeks to centiliter per fortnight conversion exact?

Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and centiliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.