Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days Converter — mL/wk to cm3/d
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.1428571429 cubic centimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.15740741e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Days
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per days = milliliter per weeks × 0.142857142857
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per days factor of 0.142857142857.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.1428571429 = 0.1428571429 cm3/d
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.1428571429 cubic centimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.1428571429 = 8.571428571 cm3/d
60 milliliter per weeks = 8.571428571 cubic centimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.0142857143 cm3/d |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.1428571429 cm3/d |
| 10 mL/wk | 1.428571429 cm3/d |
| 60 mL/wk | 8.571428571 cm3/d |
| 100 mL/wk | 14.28571429 cm3/d |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 142.8571429 cm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks
0.1428571429 cm3/d × 7 = 1 mL/wk
0.1428571429 cubic centimeter per days = 1 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per days × 7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per days are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.1428571429 cubic centimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per days?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.1428571429. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per days back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per days equals 7 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per days?
Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1428571429 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.