Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes Converter — mL/wk to cm3/min
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000992063 cubic centimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per minutes = milliliter per weeks × 0.0000992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per minutes factor of 0.0000992063492063.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.00009920634921 = 0.0000992063 cm3/min
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000992063 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.00009920634921 = 0.005952381 cm3/min
60 milliliter per weeks = 0.005952381 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.0000099206 cm3/min |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.0000992063 cm3/min |
| 10 mL/wk | 0.0009920635 cm3/min |
| 60 mL/wk | 0.005952381 cm3/min |
| 100 mL/wk | 0.0099206349 cm3/min |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0992063492 cm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Milliliter per Weeks
0.0000992063 cm3/min × 10080 = 0.999999504 mL/wk
0.0000992063 cubic centimeter per minutes = 0.999999504 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per minutes × 10080
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0000992063 cubic centimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.00009920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 10,080 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00009920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.