Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — mL/wk to cm3/s
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000016534 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = milliliter per weeks × 0.00000165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.00000165343915344.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000016534 cm3/s
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000016534 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.000001653439153 = 0.0000992063 cm3/s
60 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000992063 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 1.653439e-7 cm3/s |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.0000016534 cm3/s |
| 10 mL/wk | 0.0000165344 cm3/s |
| 60 mL/wk | 0.0000992063 cm3/s |
| 100 mL/wk | 0.0001653439 cm3/s |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0016534392 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks
0.0000016534 cm3/s × 604800 = 0.99997632 mL/wk
0.0000016534 cubic centimeter per seconds = 0.99997632 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per seconds × 604800
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0000016534 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.000001653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 604,800 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.