Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight Converter — mL/wk to ft3/fn
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000706293 cubic foot per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.34100914e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Fortnight
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per fortnight = milliliter per weeks × 0.000070629333443
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic foot per fortnight factor of 0.000070629333443.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.00007062933344 = 0.0000706293 ft3/fn
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000706293 cubic feet per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.00007062933344 = 0.00423776 ft3/fn
60 milliliter per weeks = 0.00423776 cubic feet per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.0000070629 ft3/fn |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.0000706293 ft3/fn |
| 10 mL/wk | 0.0007062933 ft3/fn |
| 60 mL/wk | 0.00423776 ft3/fn |
| 100 mL/wk | 0.0070629333 ft3/fn |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0706293334 ft3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks
0.0000706293 ft3/fn × 14158.4233 = 0.9999995265 mL/wk
0.0000706293 cubic feet per fortnight = 0.9999995265 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic feet per fortnight × 14158.423296
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0000706293 cubic feet per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic foot per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.00007062933344. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 14,158.4233 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic foot per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic foot per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00007062933344 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.