Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond Converter — mL/wk to in3/ms
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 1.00899e-10 cubic inch per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 0.016387064.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic inches per Millisecond
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic inch per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inches per millisecond = milliliter per weeks × 1.00899e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 0.016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic inch per millisecond factor of 1.00899e-10.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 1.00899e-10 = 1.00899e-10 in3/ms
1 milliliter per weeks = 1.00899e-10 cubic inches per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 1.00899e-10 = 6.053943e-9 in3/ms
60 milliliter per weeks = 6.053943e-9 cubic inches per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 1.00899e-11 in3/ms |
| 1 mL/wk | 1.00899e-10 in3/ms |
| 10 mL/wk | 1.00899e-9 in3/ms |
| 60 mL/wk | 6.053943e-9 in3/ms |
| 100 mL/wk | 1.00899e-8 in3/ms |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 1.00899e-7 in3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Weeks
1.00899e-10 in3/ms × 9910896307 = 0.9999995265 mL/wk
1.00899e-10 cubic inches per millisecond = 0.9999995265 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic inches per millisecond × 9910896307.2
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Millisecond to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inches per millisecond are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.00899e-10 cubic inches per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic inch per millisecond?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 1.00899e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per millisecond back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per millisecond equals 9,910,896,307 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per millisecond?
Cubic inch per Millisecond (in3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic inch per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic inch per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.00899e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.