Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Minutes Converter — mL/wk to m3/min
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 9.920635e-11 cubic meter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 0.01666666667.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Meter per Minutes
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Meter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per minutes = milliliter per weeks × 9.920635e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic meter per minutes equals 0.0166666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic meter per minutes factor of 9.920635e-11.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 9.920635e-11 = 9.920635e-11 m3/min
1 milliliter per weeks = 9.920635e-11 cubic meter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 9.920635e-11 = 5.952381e-9 m3/min
60 milliliter per weeks = 5.952381e-9 cubic meter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 9.920635e-12 m3/min |
| 1 mL/wk | 9.920635e-11 m3/min |
| 10 mL/wk | 9.920635e-10 m3/min |
| 60 mL/wk | 5.952381e-9 m3/min |
| 100 mL/wk | 9.920635e-9 m3/min |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 9.920635e-8 m3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Minutes to Milliliter per Weeks
9.920635e-11 m3/min × 10080000000 = 1.000000008 mL/wk
9.920635e-11 cubic meter per minutes = 1.000000008 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic meter per minutes × 10080000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Minutes to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per minutes are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 9.920635e-11 cubic meter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic meter per minutes?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 9.920635e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per minutes back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per minutes equals 10,080,000,000 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per minutes?
Cubic Meter per Minutes (m3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic meter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic meter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 9.920635e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.