Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days Converter — mL/wk to mm3/d
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 142.8571429 cubic millimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.15740741e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Days
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per days = milliliter per weeks × 142.857142857
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per days factor of 142.857142857.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 142.8571429 = 142.8571429 mm3/d
1 milliliter per weeks = 142.8571429 cubic millimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 142.8571429 = 8,571.428571 mm3/d
60 milliliter per weeks = 8,571.428571 cubic millimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 14.28571429 mm3/d |
| 1 mL/wk | 142.8571429 mm3/d |
| 10 mL/wk | 1,428.571429 mm3/d |
| 60 mL/wk | 8,571.428571 mm3/d |
| 100 mL/wk | 14,285.71429 mm3/d |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 142,857.1429 mm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks
142.8571429 mm3/d × 0.007 = 1 mL/wk
142.8571429 cubic millimeter per days = 1 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic millimeter per days × 0.007
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Days to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per days are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 142.8571429 cubic millimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per days?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 142.8571429. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 0.007 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 142.8571429 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.