Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — mL/wk to mm3/h
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 5.952380952 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Milliliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = milliliter per weeks × 5.95238095238
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 5.95238095238.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 5.952380952 = 5.952380952 mm3/h
1 milliliter per weeks = 5.952380952 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 5.952380952 = 357.1428571 mm3/h
60 milliliter per weeks = 357.1428571 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.5952380952 mm3/h |
| 1 mL/wk | 5.952380952 mm3/h |
| 10 mL/wk | 59.52380952 mm3/h |
| 60 mL/wk | 357.1428571 mm3/h |
| 100 mL/wk | 595.2380952 mm3/h |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 5,952.380952 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks
5.952380952 mm3/h × 0.168 = 0.9999999999 mL/wk
5.952380952 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.9999999999 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.168
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 5.952380952 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 5.952380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.168 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.952380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.