Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds Converter — mL/wk to metric cup/s
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 6.613757e-9 metric cup per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 0.00025.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Seconds
Milliliter per Weeks and Metric cup per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per seconds = milliliter per weeks × 6.613757e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 metric cup per seconds equals 0.00025 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-metric cup per seconds factor of 6.613757e-9.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 6.613757e-9 = 6.613757e-9 metric cup/s
1 milliliter per weeks = 6.613757e-9 metric cup per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 6.613757e-9 = 3.968254e-7 metric cup/s
60 milliliter per weeks = 3.968254e-7 metric cup per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 6.613757e-10 metric cup/s |
| 1 mL/wk | 6.613757e-9 metric cup/s |
| 10 mL/wk | 6.613757e-8 metric cup/s |
| 60 mL/wk | 3.968254e-7 metric cup/s |
| 100 mL/wk | 6.613757e-7 metric cup/s |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0000066138 metric cup/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks
6.613757e-9 metric cup/s × 151200000 = 1.000000058 mL/wk
6.613757e-9 metric cup per seconds = 1.000000058 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = metric cup per seconds × 151200000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per seconds are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 6.613757e-9 metric cup per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to metric cup per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 6.613757e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per seconds back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per seconds equals 151,200,000 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per seconds?
Metric cup per Seconds (metric cup/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to metric cup per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and metric cup per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6.613757e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.