Milliliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours Converter — mL/wk to mL/h

Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Milliliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 milliliter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 2.77777778e-10.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours

Milliliter per Weeks and Milliliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

milliliter per hours = milliliter per weeks × 0.00595238095238

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-milliliter per hours factor of 0.00595238095238.

Simple example

1 mL/wk × 0.005952380952 = 0.005952381 mL/h

1 milliliter per weeks = 0.005952381 milliliter per hours.

Real-world example

60 mL/wk × 0.005952380952 = 0.3571428571 mL/h

60 milliliter per weeks = 0.3571428571 milliliter per hours.

Conversion table

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
0.1 mL/wk0.0005952381 mL/h
1 mL/wk0.005952381 mL/h
10 mL/wk0.0595238095 mL/h
60 mL/wk0.3571428571 mL/h
100 mL/wk0.5952380952 mL/h
1,000 mL/wk5.952380952 mL/h

Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks

0.005952381 mL/h × 168 = 1.000000008 mL/wk

0.005952381 milliliter per hours = 1.000000008 milliliter per weeks.

milliliter per weeks = milliliter per hours × 168

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks.

Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliliter per hours are in 1 milliliter per weeks?

1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.005952381 milliliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert milliliter per weeks to milliliter per hours?

Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.005952380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert milliliter per hours back to milliliter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per hours equals 168 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a milliliter per weeks?

Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a milliliter per hours?

Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the milliliter per weeks to milliliter per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and milliliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005952380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.