Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds Converter — mL/wk to imp pt/s
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 2.909646e-9 imperial pint per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 0.00056826125.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Seconds
Milliliter per Weeks and Imperial pint per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per seconds = milliliter per weeks × 2.909646e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-imperial pint per seconds factor of 2.909646e-9.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 2.909646e-9 = 2.909646e-9 imp pt/s
1 milliliter per weeks = 2.909646e-9 imperial pint per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 2.909646e-9 = 1.745788e-7 imp pt/s
60 milliliter per weeks = 1.745788e-7 imperial pint per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 2.909646e-10 imp pt/s |
| 1 mL/wk | 2.909646e-9 imp pt/s |
| 10 mL/wk | 2.909646e-8 imp pt/s |
| 60 mL/wk | 1.745788e-7 imp pt/s |
| 100 mL/wk | 2.909646e-7 imp pt/s |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0000029096 imp pt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks
2.909646e-9 imp pt/s × 343684404 = 0.9999999514 mL/wk
2.909646e-9 imperial pint per seconds = 0.9999999514 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = imperial pint per seconds × 343684404
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per seconds are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 2.909646e-9 imperial pint per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to imperial pint per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 2.909646e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 343,684,404 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to imperial pint per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and imperial pint per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.909646e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.