Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours Converter — mL/wk to metric tsp/h
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0011904762 metric teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 1.38888889e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours
Milliliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per hours = milliliter per weeks × 0.00119047619048
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per hours factor of 0.00119047619048.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.00119047619 = 0.0011904762 metric tsp/h
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.0011904762 metric teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.00119047619 = 0.0714285714 metric tsp/h
60 milliliter per weeks = 0.0714285714 metric teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.0001190476 metric tsp/h |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.0011904762 metric tsp/h |
| 10 mL/wk | 0.0119047619 metric tsp/h |
| 60 mL/wk | 0.0714285714 metric tsp/h |
| 100 mL/wk | 0.119047619 metric tsp/h |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 1.19047619 metric tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks
0.0011904762 metric tsp/h × 840 = 1.000000008 mL/wk
0.0011904762 metric teaspoon per hours = 1.000000008 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per hours × 840
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Hours to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per hours are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.0011904762 metric teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.00119047619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 840 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00119047619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.