Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds Converter — mL/wk to metric tsp/s
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 3.306878e-7 metric teaspoon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 5e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Seconds
Milliliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per seconds = milliliter per weeks × 3.306878e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 0.000005 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per seconds factor of 3.306878e-7.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 3.306878e-7 = 3.306878e-7 metric tsp/s
1 milliliter per weeks = 3.306878e-7 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 3.306878e-7 = 0.0000198413 metric tsp/s
60 milliliter per weeks = 0.0000198413 metric teaspoon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 3.306878e-8 metric tsp/s |
| 1 mL/wk | 3.306878e-7 metric tsp/s |
| 10 mL/wk | 0.0000033069 metric tsp/s |
| 60 mL/wk | 0.0000198413 metric tsp/s |
| 100 mL/wk | 0.0000330688 metric tsp/s |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 0.0003306878 metric tsp/s |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks
3.306878e-7 metric tsp/s × 3024000 = 0.9999999072 mL/wk
3.306878e-7 metric teaspoon per seconds = 0.9999999072 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per seconds × 3024000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Seconds to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per seconds are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 3.306878e-7 metric teaspoon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 3.306878e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per seconds back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per seconds equals 3,024,000 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per seconds?
Metric teaspoon per Seconds (metric tsp/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.306878e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.