Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Weeks to Teaspoons per Fortnight Converter — mL/wk to tsp/fn
Convert Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) to Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per weeks = 0.4057682724 teaspoon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Weeks to Teaspoons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-12 / 4.07483597e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Weeks to Teaspoons per Fortnight
Milliliter per Weeks and Teaspoon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoons per fortnight = milliliter per weeks × 0.405768272422
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, and 1 teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.074836e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per weeks-to-teaspoon per fortnight factor of 0.405768272422.
Simple example
1 mL/wk × 0.4057682724 = 0.4057682724 tsp/fn
1 milliliter per weeks = 0.4057682724 teaspoons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 mL/wk × 0.4057682724 = 24.34609635 tsp/fn
60 milliliter per weeks = 24.34609635 teaspoons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) | Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/wk | 0.0405768272 tsp/fn |
| 1 mL/wk | 0.4057682724 tsp/fn |
| 10 mL/wk | 4.057682724 tsp/fn |
| 60 mL/wk | 24.34609635 tsp/fn |
| 100 mL/wk | 40.57682724 tsp/fn |
| 1,000 mL/wk | 405.7682724 tsp/fn |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks
0.4057682724 tsp/fn × 2.464460797 = 0.9999999999 mL/wk
0.4057682724 teaspoons per fortnight = 0.9999999999 milliliter per weeks.
milliliter per weeks = teaspoons per fortnight × 2.46446079687
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Fortnight to Milliliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoons per fortnight are in 1 milliliter per weeks?
1 milliliter per weeks equals 0.4057682724 teaspoons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per weeks to teaspoon per fortnight?
Multiply the milliliter per weeks value by 0.4057682724. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per fortnight back to milliliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per fortnight equals 2.464460797 milliliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per weeks?
Milliliter per Weeks (mL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per fortnight?
Teaspoon per Fortnight (tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per weeks to teaspoon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per weeks and teaspoon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.4057682724 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.