Volumetric flow rate.
Milliliter per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — mL/yr to mm3/s
Convert Milliliter per Years (mL/yr) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 milliliter per years = 0.0000316887 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Milliliter per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Milliliter per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Milliliter per Years and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = milliliter per years × 0.0000316887385068
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 milliliter per years equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct milliliter per years-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.0000316887385068.
Simple example
1 mL/yr × 0.00003168873851 = 0.0000316887 mm3/s
1 milliliter per years = 0.0000316887 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 mL/yr × 0.00003168873851 = 0.0019013243 mm3/s
60 milliliter per years = 0.0019013243 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Milliliter per Years (mL/yr) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 mL/yr | 0.0000031689 mm3/s |
| 1 mL/yr | 0.0000316887 mm3/s |
| 10 mL/yr | 0.0003168874 mm3/s |
| 60 mL/yr | 0.0019013243 mm3/s |
| 100 mL/yr | 0.0031688739 mm3/s |
| 1,000 mL/yr | 0.0316887385 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Milliliter per Years
0.0000316887 mm3/s × 31556.952 = 0.9999987848 mL/yr
0.0000316887 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999987848 milliliter per years.
milliliter per years = cubic millimeter per seconds × 31556.952
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Milliliter per Years.
Understanding the Milliliter per Years (mL/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 milliliter per years?
1 milliliter per years equals 0.0000316887 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert milliliter per years to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the milliliter per years value by 0.00003168873851. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to milliliter per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 31,556.952 milliliter per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a milliliter per years?
Milliliter per Years (mL/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the milliliter per years to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both milliliter per years and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00003168873851 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.