Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Decades to Cubic foot per Hours Converter — imp pt/decade to ft3/h
Convert Imperial pint per Decades (imp pt/decade) to Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per decades = 2.289342e-7 cubic foot per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Decades to Cubic foot per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.80074822e-12 / 7.86579072e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Decades to Cubic foot per Hours
Imperial pint per Decades and Cubic foot per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per hours = imperial pint per decades × 2.289342e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per decades equals 1.800748e-12 base units, and 1 cubic foot per hours equals 0.00000786579072 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per decades-to-cubic foot per hours factor of 2.289342e-7.
Simple example
1 imp pt/decade × 2.289342e-7 = 2.289342e-7 ft3/h
1 imperial pint per decades = 2.289342e-7 cubic foot per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/decade × 2.289342e-7 = 0.000013736 ft3/h
60 imperial pint per decades = 0.000013736 cubic foot per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Decades (imp pt/decade) | Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/decade | 2.289342e-8 ft3/h |
| 1 imp pt/decade | 2.289342e-7 ft3/h |
| 10 imp pt/decade | 0.0000022893 ft3/h |
| 60 imp pt/decade | 0.000013736 ft3/h |
| 100 imp pt/decade | 0.0000228934 ft3/h |
| 1,000 imp pt/decade | 0.0002289342 ft3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial pint per Decades
2.289342e-7 ft3/h × 4368068.035 = 1.000000161 imp pt/decade
2.289342e-7 cubic foot per hours = 1.000000161 imperial pint per decades.
imperial pint per decades = cubic foot per hours × 4368068.03549
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Hours to Imperial pint per Decades.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Decades (imp pt/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per hours are in 1 imperial pint per decades?
1 imperial pint per decades equals 2.289342e-7 cubic foot per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per decades to cubic foot per hours?
Multiply the imperial pint per decades value by 2.289342e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per hours back to imperial pint per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per hours equals 4,368,068.035 imperial pint per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per decades?
Imperial pint per Decades (imp pt/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per hours?
Cubic foot per Hours (ft3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per decades to cubic foot per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per decades and cubic foot per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.289342e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.