Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Seconds Converter — imp pt/h to in3/s
Convert Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) to Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per hours = 0.0096326192 cubic inch per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.57850347e-7 / 1.6387064e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic inch per Seconds
Imperial pint per Hours and Cubic inch per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per seconds = imperial pint per hours × 0.00963261919415
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, and 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 0.000016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per hours-to-cubic inch per seconds factor of 0.00963261919415.
Simple example
1 imp pt/h × 0.009632619194 = 0.0096326192 in3/s
1 imperial pint per hours = 0.0096326192 cubic inch per seconds.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/h × 0.009632619194 = 0.5779571516 in3/s
60 imperial pint per hours = 0.5779571516 cubic inch per seconds.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) | Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/h | 0.0009632619 in3/s |
| 1 imp pt/h | 0.0096326192 in3/s |
| 10 imp pt/h | 0.0963261919 in3/s |
| 60 imp pt/h | 0.5779571516 in3/s |
| 100 imp pt/h | 0.9632619194 in3/s |
| 1,000 imp pt/h | 9.632619194 in3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Seconds to Imperial pint per Hours
0.0096326192 in3/s × 103.8139243 = 1.000000001 imp pt/h
0.0096326192 cubic inch per seconds = 1.000000001 imperial pint per hours.
imperial pint per hours = cubic inch per seconds × 103.813924317
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Seconds to Imperial pint per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per seconds are in 1 imperial pint per hours?
1 imperial pint per hours equals 0.0096326192 cubic inch per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours to cubic inch per seconds?
Multiply the imperial pint per hours value by 0.009632619194. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per seconds back to imperial pint per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 103.8139243 imperial pint per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per seconds?
Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per hours to cubic inch per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per hours and cubic inch per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.009632619194 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.