Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Days Converter — imp pt/h to mm3/d
Convert Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per hours = 13,638,270 cubic millimeter per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.57850347e-7 / 1.15740741e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Days
Imperial pint per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per days = imperial pint per hours × 13638270
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 1.157407e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per hours-to-cubic millimeter per days factor of 13638270.
Simple example
1 imp pt/h × 13638270 = 13,638,270 mm3/d
1 imperial pint per hours = 13,638,270 cubic millimeter per days.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/h × 13638270 = 818,296,200 mm3/d
60 imperial pint per hours = 818,296,200 cubic millimeter per days.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/h | 1,363,827 mm3/d |
| 1 imp pt/h | 13,638,270 mm3/d |
| 10 imp pt/h | 136,382,700 mm3/d |
| 60 imp pt/h | 818,296,200 mm3/d |
| 100 imp pt/h | 1,363,827,000 mm3/d |
| 1,000 imp pt/h | 13,638,270,000 mm3/d |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Days to Imperial pint per Hours
1 mm3/d × 7.332308e-8 = 7.332308e-8 imp pt/h
1 cubic millimeter per days = 7.332308e-8 imperial pint per hours.
imperial pint per hours = cubic millimeter per days × 7.332308e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Days to Imperial pint per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per days are in 1 imperial pint per hours?
1 imperial pint per hours equals 13,638,270 cubic millimeter per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours to cubic millimeter per days?
Multiply the imperial pint per hours value by 13638270. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per days back to imperial pint per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per days equals 7.332308e-8 imperial pint per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per days?
Cubic Millimeter per Days (mm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per hours to cubic millimeter per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per hours and cubic millimeter per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 13638270 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.