Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic yard per Weeks Converter — imp pt/h to yd3/wk
Convert Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) to Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per hours = 0.1248672859 cubic yard per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic yard per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.57850347e-7 / 1.26414494e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Hours to Cubic yard per Weeks
Imperial pint per Hours and Cubic yard per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per weeks = imperial pint per hours × 0.12486728585
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, and 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 0.00000126414493714 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per hours-to-cubic yard per weeks factor of 0.12486728585.
Simple example
1 imp pt/h × 0.1248672859 = 0.1248672859 yd3/wk
1 imperial pint per hours = 0.1248672859 cubic yard per weeks.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/h × 0.1248672859 = 7.492037151 yd3/wk
60 imperial pint per hours = 7.492037151 cubic yard per weeks.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) | Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/h | 0.0124867286 yd3/wk |
| 1 imp pt/h | 0.1248672859 yd3/wk |
| 10 imp pt/h | 1.248672859 yd3/wk |
| 60 imp pt/h | 7.492037151 yd3/wk |
| 100 imp pt/h | 12.48672859 yd3/wk |
| 1,000 imp pt/h | 124.8672859 yd3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours
0.1248672859 yd3/wk × 8.008502733 = 1 imp pt/h
0.1248672859 cubic yard per weeks = 1 imperial pint per hours.
imperial pint per hours = cubic yard per weeks × 8.00850273306
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per weeks are in 1 imperial pint per hours?
1 imperial pint per hours equals 0.1248672859 cubic yard per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours to cubic yard per weeks?
Multiply the imperial pint per hours value by 0.1248672859. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per weeks back to imperial pint per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per weeks equals 8.008502733 imperial pint per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per weeks?
Cubic yard per Weeks (yd3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per hours to cubic yard per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per hours and cubic yard per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1248672859 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.