Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — imp pt/s to cL/min
Convert Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per seconds = 3,409.5675 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.00056826125 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Seconds to Centiliter per Minutes
Imperial pint per Seconds and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = imperial pint per seconds × 3409.5675
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per seconds-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 3409.5675.
Simple example
1 imp pt/s × 3409.5675 = 3,409.5675 cL/min
1 imperial pint per seconds = 3,409.5675 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/s × 3409.5675 = 204,574.05 cL/min
60 imperial pint per seconds = 204,574.05 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/s | 340.95675 cL/min |
| 1 imp pt/s | 3,409.5675 cL/min |
| 10 imp pt/s | 34,095.675 cL/min |
| 60 imp pt/s | 204,574.05 cL/min |
| 100 imp pt/s | 340,956.75 cL/min |
| 1,000 imp pt/s | 3,409,567.5 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial pint per Seconds
1 cL/min × 0.0002932923311 = 0.0002932923 imp pt/s
1 centiliter per minutes = 0.0002932923 imperial pint per seconds.
imperial pint per seconds = centiliter per minutes × 0.000293292331065
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial pint per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 imperial pint per seconds?
1 imperial pint per seconds equals 3,409.5675 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the imperial pint per seconds value by 3409.5675. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to imperial pint per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 0.0002932923 imperial pint per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per seconds to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per seconds and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3409.5675 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.