Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic inch per Minutes Converter — imp pt/s to in3/min
Convert Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) to Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per seconds = 2,080.645746 cubic inch per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic inch per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.00056826125 / 2.73117733e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic inch per Minutes
Imperial pint per Seconds and Cubic inch per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per minutes = imperial pint per seconds × 2080.64574594
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, and 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 2.731177e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per seconds-to-cubic inch per minutes factor of 2080.64574594.
Simple example
1 imp pt/s × 2080.645746 = 2,080.645746 in3/min
1 imperial pint per seconds = 2,080.645746 cubic inch per minutes.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/s × 2080.645746 = 124,838.7448 in3/min
60 imperial pint per seconds = 124,838.7448 cubic inch per minutes.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) | Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/s | 208.0645746 in3/min |
| 1 imp pt/s | 2,080.645746 in3/min |
| 10 imp pt/s | 20,806.45746 in3/min |
| 60 imp pt/s | 124,838.7448 in3/min |
| 100 imp pt/s | 208,064.5746 in3/min |
| 1,000 imp pt/s | 2,080,645.746 in3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Minutes to Imperial pint per Seconds
1 in3/min × 0.00048062002 = 0.00048062 imp pt/s
1 cubic inch per minutes = 0.00048062 imperial pint per seconds.
imperial pint per seconds = cubic inch per minutes × 0.000480620019988
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Minutes to Imperial pint per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per minutes are in 1 imperial pint per seconds?
1 imperial pint per seconds equals 2,080.645746 cubic inch per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds to cubic inch per minutes?
Multiply the imperial pint per seconds value by 2080.645746. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per minutes back to imperial pint per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per minutes equals 0.00048062 imperial pint per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per minutes?
Cubic inch per Minutes (in3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per seconds to cubic inch per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per seconds and cubic inch per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2080.645746 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.