Volumetric flow rate.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic yard per Hours Converter — imp pt/s to yd3/h
Convert Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) to Cubic yard per Hours (yd3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 imperial pint per seconds = 2.675727554 cubic yard per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic yard per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.00056826125 / 0.0002123763494.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Imperial pint per Seconds to Cubic yard per Hours
Imperial pint per Seconds and Cubic yard per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yard per hours = imperial pint per seconds × 2.67572755393
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 imperial pint per seconds equals 0.00056826125 base units, and 1 cubic yard per hours equals 0.00021237634944 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct imperial pint per seconds-to-cubic yard per hours factor of 2.67572755393.
Simple example
1 imp pt/s × 2.675727554 = 2.675727554 yd3/h
1 imperial pint per seconds = 2.675727554 cubic yard per hours.
Real-world example
60 imp pt/s × 2.675727554 = 160.5436532 yd3/h
60 imperial pint per seconds = 160.5436532 cubic yard per hours.
Conversion table
| Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) | Cubic yard per Hours (yd3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 imp pt/s | 0.2675727554 yd3/h |
| 1 imp pt/s | 2.675727554 yd3/h |
| 10 imp pt/s | 26.75727554 yd3/h |
| 60 imp pt/s | 160.5436532 yd3/h |
| 100 imp pt/s | 267.5727554 yd3/h |
| 1,000 imp pt/s | 2,675.727554 yd3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Hours to Imperial pint per Seconds
2.675727554 yd3/h × 0.3737301275 = 1 imp pt/s
2.675727554 cubic yard per hours = 1 imperial pint per seconds.
imperial pint per seconds = cubic yard per hours × 0.373730127543
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Hours to Imperial pint per Seconds.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Hours (yd3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yard per hours are in 1 imperial pint per seconds?
1 imperial pint per seconds equals 2.675727554 cubic yard per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert imperial pint per seconds to cubic yard per hours?
Multiply the imperial pint per seconds value by 2.675727554. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per hours back to imperial pint per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per hours equals 0.3737301275 imperial pint per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a imperial pint per seconds?
Imperial pint per Seconds (imp pt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per hours?
Cubic yard per Hours (yd3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the imperial pint per seconds to cubic yard per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both imperial pint per seconds and cubic yard per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.675727554 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.